Mom With Breast Cancer Hurt By Short-Term Insurance

By Consumers for Quality Care, on May 30, 2018

Mom With Breast Cancer Hurt By Short-Term Insurance

Amanda Schornhorst wasn’t too alarmed when she felt a lump in her breast. Six years prior, she had been diagnosed with cysts, WTHR reports. She expected a mammogram to show the same thing this time around.

When Schornhorst went to the doctor for a routine check-up a few months later, she was not surprised when he ordered tests to rule out anything more serious. Unfortunately, the tests confirmed Stage 2 breast cancer instead.

“It’s aggressive and it has spread to a few of the lymph nodes, so the recommendation was chemotherapy right away,” Schornhorst explained. “This disease is terrible. We know there’s a lot of survivors, and I’m going to be one. But I was scared and I’m scared every day.”

Schornhorst and her doctors wanted to start treatment immediately. Her insurer, United Healthcare, put a stop to that, saying they would not pay any medical bills until they reviewed her medical records further.

“My chemotherapy was put on hold because they say my cancer was a pre-existing condition. It makes me so mad. This is the same insurance company I’ve had for over five years. They would have known if I had breast cancer.”

After two weeks, Schorhorst’s oncologist Brian Mulherin determined that she could not wait any longer for treatment. He feared any longer delay would advance the disease to a point that it may no longer be curable.

Schornhorst moved forward with treatments, quickly accumulating over $200,000 in medical bills.

While Schornhorst had health insurance, it was a short-term health plan – CQC has previously highlighted the risks associated with these types of plans and voiced our opposition to a proposed rule that would expand them further.

Schornhorst had been purchasing short-term health care plans every 3 months for the past several years. The plan was inexpensive, saving the Schornhorsts as much as $10,000 a year.

“For us, we felt that was the only option to do the short-term plan,” said Schornhorst, who is a stay-at-home mom. “We are very healthy and we don’t go to the doctor very often, so it seemed to make sense.”

Schornhorst learned first hand that these short-term plans can carry risks for consumers.

“People need to know if you have a pre-existing condition, it’s not going to be covered under a short-term policy, and you’re not going to have coverage for any ongoing conditions,” said Tony Nefouse, owner of Nefouse & Associates Insurance in Indianapolis. “So many families will look at the savings and go with a savings versus a permanent policy, but if they’re going into it blindly and not reading the policy and the exclusions, it can be a bad thing.”

Mark Howard, an Indianapolis insurance broker, says that short-term plans leave consumers like Schornhorst “up a creek without a paddle.”

“The insurance company has denied every claim we have submitted from the very beginning,” she said, flipping through a large stack of denial notices from United Healthcare. “They even denied paying for the initial mammogram. The financial detriment that I’m doing to our family, do I stop treatment and let the cancer win? The internal struggle that I have because of the amount of bills that come, it’s too hard. It’s not fair.”

Join us in the fight for quality health care

Consumers for Quality Care is first and foremost about you — and all of the consumers demanding better care. Add your voice and join the debate.